Trust cinema Haft Sabah wrote: We have to admit that if the composition of the makers of “funnel” was different from what it is now, we probably wouldn’t have written this harsh article against it! Don’t get me wrong, it’s not about a personal problem with the filmmakers; It is important to discuss the issue that the functions are sometimes so inconsistent with the claims that it is difficult to see their output and remain silent!
Pay attention to these three names: Reza Attaran, Mohsen Amiriousfi and Saeed Malekan. What should really be expected from the output of this combination? One is the flagship of the box office and popular among the audience and the other two are serious figures in the field of cinema who are often in the center of attention of critics and film media.
When the previews related to “Qif” were published, the general audience was excited by Attaran’s appearance in a new film, and the more professional cinema lovers were hoping for a serious and standard film, even though in the field of comedy cinema, due to the end of Amiryousofi and Malekan’s several-year absence from production. to face
What is on the screen these days is a clear example of insulting both groups! Yes, the movie can be of poor quality, the movie can be weak, the movie can not be according to our taste, and none of these are reasons to consider its production and release as an insult. But it is more difficult to bear the inconsistency of the claim arising from a combination with what they have put in front of us, than to bear the insult! “Funnel” has angered a significant part of its audience.