cinema trust Farzaneh Metin wrote in Etemad newspaper: Our language is incapable of watching a movie in two situations from what we have seen, either the movie is a masterpiece in all fields or it is so bad that we don’t know how to describe it, and the Seventy Thirty movie is one of them. It is placed in the second category. These days, what can I say, these years when the cinema is facing the tragedy of the comedy genre, Bahram Afshari, as his first directorial experience, made a film in the genre A comedy with a social issue has been sent to cinemas with his own acting. The movie Heftad Si, written by Hamza Salehi and produced by Ebrahim Amerian, has been released with famous actors such as Hoten Shakiba, Mehdi Hosseininia, Siavash Tahamvorth and Sadaf Espahbadi.
The story is about the concerns of the poor and their problems. The family of Brat, Parviz and Yaqoob live in a non-residential area similar to a garage in the suburbs of the city and they have two months to look for another shelter for themselves. In the meantime, Yaqoob lives in a The bus lives and wins a prize of 30 billion tomans, and on the other hand, he is in love with Parviz’s mother and tells his neighbors that he plans to share this money among everyone. slow, but he doesn’t know that he doesn’t have two more weeks to live because of a brain tumor. As it turned out, the main motif of the film is poverty, which is mixed with shouting, shouting, dancing, and accent, and its distinction from other comedy films is that there are no sexual jokes, but it makes fun of poverty and misery as much as you want. Tension There is a lot between the characters so that sometimes the audience has to listen to the annoying voices.
What is well shown in the 70s is that poor people are not looking for efforts to build a better life and their eyes are on the hands of others and they want to choose the fastest possible way to get rich or now through the stock market. Or the 30 billion lottery that we do not know the source and origin of this lottery company, on what basis they register and donate this amount of money to a happy citizen, or the one because He wants to release his brother from prison, he wants to sell his kidney, and the other one is after the smuggling of Afghans, none of the characters are looking for a way and trying for a better situation, and they are sitting in their houses from morning to night, making plans and hurting each other. They load
The story of the movie is a mystery. Of course, the award may be a very low copy of Mehran Moderi’s “Grand Prize” series, but where is that and where is this.
The film lacks characterization and none of the actors except Parviz played by Hooten Shakiba have fallen into the same type, even the presence of some of them does not help the progress of the story, like the goddess Hesari who was there and her absence is not noticeable. It must be clearly stated that it lacks any elements of cinema. A celebrity who is looking for an investor to make his film, and it is not a director or film maker.
This product is pointless and, in a heartless word, vulgarity. Let us know that vulgarity does not only mean sexual jokes. This work is full of cultural and social vulgarities. The comedy genre has a definition, especially when the social issue is added to it. That the actors turn around and say ping-pong dialogues to each other and, may Allah, that they all have a low IQ, so that it was not a product. comedy
Why are all people stupid in Iranian comedies? Of course, it is neither the fault of the director nor the writer, so many vulgar comedies with a bunch of stupid characters have been fed to Iranian cinema in these years that they have changed the taste of the audience. Why do you resort to anything to make a movie when you can’t make the audience laugh? Why? In such works, you show the wealthy class, either real estate or car salesmen, who are greedy, greedy and ambitious. are Why don’t you go to another class?
Mr. author of these concepts of the past, update yourself a little and collect these bowls and jars. The audience is tired of seeing dances in any Iranian or foreign form and performed. I am ignorant of assuming the audience for a producer, of all things. It is worse. Mr. Bahram Afshari, it is true that the Capital series was your launch pad in the cinema and you have established your position in the cinema by playing in Fossil, but you cannot play in several comedy roles. Travel the hundred-year route overnight.
Seventy thirty is just a collage of all the jokes of the virtual space and that’s it. The audience sees the teaser and on the other hand, because of the lack of socially privileged works, they watch this movie.
Let’s be more careful with our eyes and ears and don’t watch any comedy movies.
This movie had only one positive point, and that is the proof of Hooten Shakiba’s right in every role. If Pejman Jamshidi has been carrying the burden of comedy cinema for seven years with a form of play, it is Hooten Shakiba’s turn. The difference between the two is that Shakiba In every movie, he shows a different kind of humor and his comedy roles are not the same. Let’s be a genre.