Cinema TrustSaeed Rajabi Forutan wrote: The producer of one of the films on the screen has warned of the screening of several new films at the same time, saying that this prevents the profitability of Nowruz films (Kamalipour, Mohammad, Molotov Cocktail Comedy)).
The producer’s concern has been reported as news of the release of one or two new films on Wednesday this week, and the Guild has not officially announced the future program of Tehran and cities.
The screening of more than five more or less films does not change the fact that most Nowruz films have no stretching for more than eight weeks and had to replace them sooner.
Reducing the sale of any movie on cinema campuses has no meaning other than the lamp of the movie theater or the hall is available to the bestselling movies. In other words, the delay in changing the film does not help to continue selling it and does not make the film happy. Of the ten films on the screen of three Nowruz screenings, five have been out of the spotlight for a long time away from the Iqbal audience. Two films released in recent weeks have a maximum of four weeks of screening, and they will have to replace new titles in the near future.
Good cinema activists remember; In the years when Iranian cinema had less than 500 cinemas, the public agreement of the government and the guilds was that the solution was to expand the longitudinal expansion of the screening, and more time and opportunity should be given to the films. But in recent years, when the number of halls has increased by 100 % compared to the past, the transverse expansion of each movie in the number of more venues provides enough opportunity for the film to be seen better than ever before, and many films do not necessarily have the talent and capacity to enjoy the length and width of the screen.
If we exclude metropolitan areas, the limited number of cinema spectators in other cities of the country dictate that the song replacing the movie will be better, and the city spectators will not be annoyed by the long -term screening of the films and not leave the habit of going to the cinema.
One of the reasons for the delay in changing the films is apparently about the completion of this period of the performance of the Trade Union. As long as members are not ordered and the chairman and spokesman for the council have not been nominated, one cannot expect the council’s by -law to change and decide according to field facts, but what should not be ignored is the delay of film screening infrastructure across the country and the capital of the films that are in the long line.