Cinema Farzaneh Matin wrote in the newspaper Etemad: In Iranian cinema, the place of life of contemporary Persian names and celebrities is always empty. It will eat.
Last year, television director, Mohammad Reza Varzi, began making a work on Parvin Etesami’s life, which was first released at the 40th Fajr Film Festival under the name of Parvin’s miracle and later changed to Parvin and is being released these days. A film about the greatest contemporary Iranian poet who was extremely empty in the cinema frame, but unfortunately this work was not in the size of the cinema and is more of a telephoto film. He sacrificed intact for wrong policies.
Parvin is a work that will soon be forgotten after the end of its release. A series of slogan dialogues. Mohammad Reza Varzi, as a writer and director with the king’s riddle and the constitutional years, showed that the director of television is colorful showcases and has some extent to distort history. Cinema and an important subject was great and great for him. His longtime companion is produced by the film, both of which show how Parvin Etesami’s poetic history is wasted.
He was supposed to make a film from the most important Iranian female poet from his childhood to his death, not just about the last 7 years of his life (1-5). When Parvin comes to her father’s cousin and, with her husband promoted to Kermanshah, she travels to Kermanshah, with almost a 2 -minute, 5 -minute work on Parvin’s marriage and marriage to Parvin.
One of the most important questions that arise is that we have seen Parvin only in two, three short plans, except for the poetry of the poets. Why has no poetic effect? The answer is that the politician and the military resorted to the government do not fit well with his wife, and in some other sequences in the literary circle of poets, those who are attached to the court are mocking Parvin as a poet of poets. And finally, the whole film wants us to tell us that Parvin wants equality between men and women, was restricted in Pahlavi. Charismatic, which also has an Iranian feminist and feminist one, which is a childish slogan.
The character of Parvin is Zarif, modest, honest, altruistic, and emotional, but one should not go into the story of Melika Sharifinia to be present in the long sequences in order to work. Is this a story other than partying a producer to play his daughter? Now let’s make this added role at least to make it a tangible story. He found him, so Parvin was so famous at the time that his recently published Divan was asked to show him Parvin’s father’s house?
According to the documents and even the Wikipedia page that made it easy for everyone, Parvin worked in the Higher University Library from year 1 to 2, but it is shown in the film that he has been working there by Nowruz or Parvin. , Three brothers, Abul Hassan, Abolnasr and Abul Fattah, have the only character of Abu al -Fatah in the film. It is even said that at the time of his education, the American school, Helen, corresponded with the last days of his life, was not more beautiful than Parvin’s life?
One of the funny plans is when Parvin returns from Kermanshah and opens his mother at home. The camera is initially on the face of Abu al -Fatah and his back is Parvin. Abu al -Fattah goes away, the frame is on the back of Parvin, the half -turned and his face is on the camera.
The filming scenes are either in Parvin’s father’s house or at her husband’s house in Kermanshah or in the Library of the Higher University, and we do not see a trace of its passages and streets. The film is in the genre of history and biography. Some of the history should be shown to us through the images. The old Atombil, the clothing and the wearing of the time that Parvin lived, so Parvin’s film, not in the language of the image, speaks to us. He says and not in detail. Parvin is not from Tabriz and did not come to Tehran at the age of 6? So his parents have been in Tabriz at least in their conversations we have to see a Turkish accent and dozens of flaws to this film. Of course, the design of the scene is also a description of that era. The game of Mohammad Reza Sharifinia, Azita Hajian and Maral Bani Adam are respectful, and if Bani Adam took home with Simorgh last year, he must say that he came out of theater and played for Parvin’s lifeless role. Is.