Cinema Trust We do not disagree with cinema. We are opposed to prostitution centers. Cinema is one of the manifestations of civilization. ” Perhaps if the late leader of the revolution had not made this speech in Paradise Zahra on February 7th, the post -revolutionary cinema would have faced ambiguities in the Islamic Republic. Or at least in the second republic after the first six months when the space changed (after the first president was removed and from the beginning of summer), if the work was closed, post -revolutionary cinema would not have found the current form and icon. It was closed.
According to the Iranian era, but that historical and short -term ministry of Imam Khomeini (Abdul Majid Maadikhah) and then the long -term ministry of clergyman (Sayyid Mohammad Khatami) led to a cinematic formation that shone in the world.
At that time, it was said that the red lines were only three: propaganda (directly with religious beliefs and the prevalence of disbelief), naked and severe violence (criminal scenes that avoid in many other countries), and the display of tangible and consistent relationships. Of course, we must add to these three political films in the rejection of the principle of the revolution and the Islamic Republic.
With this account, the filmmakers knew their task and with the veil of women, though a single cover for the inside and outside of the house and even at the time of rest was the question of the question at first and made it difficult to believe in the films, but it was better than allowing playing and showing to play and play. Take the women and gradually decrease in the severity and concentration, and we only see that type in the Voice and Sima series, and the home theater network is closer to the street and street (before autumn 1). (In historical serials such as Mohammad Rasoolullah Majidi or Mosa Hatamikia, women have four blankets around them.
Some traditional clerics, however, did not wear the same veil of television series, and when the series “Autumn Desert” was broadcast on television, the head of the Voice of Iran- Mohammad Hashemi Rafsanjani- sought the Imam’s opinion, and interestingly, the late leader of the unified revolution. He asked why the only name Grimmor came and do women make up for men? That is, they indirectly rejected other criticisms.
From then on, in the titles of films and serials, we will see both the man’s name and the female figure. This imam’s reference meant that they have no problem with the principle of women’s play and the hijab that we see in the film “Autumn of the Desert”, especially that there was war and television had to give people hope and morale, and the Imam’s view of these things. It was as if the Islamic Republic had taken a stand against music in the early months of the Islamic Republic, but the executives said that without music, the radio and television could not be fed and the music was not necessarily rich and heard Motahari’s anthem. And in fact they changed, otherwise we didn’t have the same music.
These were to remember what was difficult to preserve cinema and music in a government where the jurisprudents have the upper hand, and fortunately we came up with a cinema that had a variety of genres, and though fearing that it would decline in the digital world. The home theater has been provided with actors, and now the cinema family has 4 members, more than half of them are young girls and women.
One of the factors that maintain cinema has been the Fajr Film Festival for the past five years, which has been left to the Ammar Festival in three years and returned to the main rail this year.
However, the screening of the two films “Hundreds” and “Antique” has been criticized, and that is the motivation for this post. The first is a comedy film that Reza Attaran plays the role of Saddam, and the second is the story of two shots starring Pejman Jamshidi and Bijan Banafshekhah, who abuse the religious feelings of the rural people in the first year after the revolution and set up a fake Imamate. And…
Technically, the two were not worthy of participating in the festival competition (the author of this line) is a debate, and that the endowment organization is to show a debate or disagree with the screening. Yes. They were not at the level of the festival, but what is the problem with their public screening?
Basically, one of the reasons that critics shake the hands of the film or the home theater network is that people are waiting and the designer to stop the show and do not want to fire.
The work has come to a point where the Public Relations Organization of the Endowment Organization commented as a film critic and written “While condemning the enclosure content of the film” Antique “reserves the right to follow up and complain to the makers of the film.”
Interestingly, the Endowment Organization is organizationally supervised by the Ministry of Culture and Guidance, though they pretend to be like one of the leadership institutions. It is true that the head of the leadership is installed after the leadership is approved, but is not directly under the leadership of the leadership, and is signed by the head of the Endowment Organization and is considered an executive body, such as the Martyrs Foundation, which is under the presidency. That representative or its chairman plays the role of both.
The Endowment Organization wrote, “It is unfortunate that a film is so superficial and worthy that not only adds to the boom in Iranian cinema, but also by disrupting the artistic and cultural atmosphere of society.
In our opinion, the film “Antique”, which acknowledges all critics of an egg -shoulder film full of humor and humor with an imitated and completely worthless story, and a mix of speech and reflection, is an insult to the Iranian people’s minds. The wise people of the country are not so simple that the authenticity of the hundreds of years of the Imamzadeh is the same as the weird and fake seedlings and the same burden of any headless. “
But what about the boom in Iranian cinema and its audience falling to the endowment? All movies that can’t be magnificent. Endowments can criticize and support other films, but they have nothing to do with the quality of the film.
Not exclusively endowed. Not long ago, Mr. Aref, the first vice president, said that the cinema should reflect the facts and there should be no. Finally, a category that is not real and based on the imagination of the screenwriter, how should it necessarily reflect the facts? Some believe that even documentary films are not the same because they are the filmmaker anyway. Apart from this, one might want to depict his fantasies. What does it have to do with Mr. First Deputy?
In short, criticism of a film and dislike it is a debate, and the threat of why you showed another debate. The position of the fundamentalist newspaper was, however, more rational who wrote that they were not suitable for the festival but were suitable for conquering the boxes.
That is, the festival is expected to be strict in selecting and participating in the competition, but it has no problem with public display and entertainment.
Given that the Endowment Organization is under the supervision of the Ministry of Culture and Guidance (in terms of formal) and the Cinema Organization and the Artistic Department are under the same ministry. Write with these phrases:
“There were forty -one works in the same festival that were culturally cultural in Iran and mocked everything in the name of comedy! So that they were in full opposition to the existence of the Fajr festival and its goals to value the cultural themes of the Islamic Revolution, and naturally they should not even be publicized during the year. “
What does the public screening of the films have to do with the endowment organization? The headquarters for the famous was low this one added? Now it is still justified about the movie “Antique”, but what about the endowments?
The endowment concern is also not understandable as they have stated themselves:
“There is no week that the factors of making a movie or a television series from the Public Relations of the Endowment and Charity Organization do not request a filmmaker for filmmaking in the spiritual and Islamic -Islamic architecture of one of the blessed Imams and shrines. However, the selection of Imamzadeh’s physical space as a location or filming place is spontaneously followed by the filmmakers, and the Endowment and Charity Organization has not given any special incentives or advertisements. Therefore, the close relationship between the Imams as one of the spiritual, cultural and social bases with the country’s cinema is a long -standing and meaningful relationship, indicating that filmmakers choose a place to tell the story of a story that occurs within the community, which properly and refuge. The people of this border are canvas. According to Saadi: Khorram, the monument where the companion is there/comfortable life and healing of the patient’s heart “…
Now all of the one has been “antique” that has been abused. Why doesn’t anyone forge a 7 -toman banknote? Because it does not exist. So every counterfeit and abuse shows that the principle is of respect and respect and has no aspect.
The film is a cultural commodity and people love a product, and some depend on the taste and class of individuals. You can write a film or theater in criticizing a movie or theater, but no one has the right to demand not to be licensed. Let’s just see unnecessary movies thanks to people’s cyberspace!
Incidentally, this procedure causes critics to go to the cane. 30 years ago when Dr. Soroush was in Iran and spoke and pressing some pressure groups, Mohsen Kadivar wrote Whenever I want to publish some of his views, the arbitraries will fall and disrupt my criticism and my criticism with them. I give up and actually wrote no one in criticism so that they would not be imagined in line with the stick and stick.
He took the best position – as it came in -. Criticizing the festival but supported the public screening because two stories are different.
The point of saying that a movie can be revealed and dislike, but we have no right to disagree with it when it has gone through the legal process of obtaining relevant licenses.