Tina Pakravan said: “What we saw against the Tasian series has been organized. The agents of the series have been trying to make the work of people love for nearly two years, then a group of motivations I do not know to be jealous and jealousy or fear have launched it.
Report Cinema“The reality is that during my career, I had never faced such experience during my professional career in this country; To understand something so wrong and to move forward with the same misconception, I understand the meaning of criticism since I have worked in the field of film criticism, and I fully understand that some may be a series. Love and others have criticized its components such as directing, acting and screenplay. But to form a case and file, I think it can be both complained and reviewable.
Pakravan added: “What we saw against the Tasian series has been organized. You see, the agents of this series have been trying to make a work that people love. Then a group of motivations I do not know to be jealous or jealous or fear have launched this attack.
The director of Tasian continued: “What does some mean that some have passed the stage of criticism of the games and the screenplay and directing to distort history?” I have made two historical serials in this land, and I have definitely studied history to make them both an expert consultant and researchers, referring to the distortion of history for no reason or referring to the wrong things like the absence of Jalal al -Ahmad in the night of Goethe’s poetry. (Shams al -Ahmad was the lecturer of the third night of Goethe) indicates the illiteracy of the narrators or the bias of their files. They do not know the difference between Jalal and Shams al -Ahmad, and they are so illiterate that they refer to the ten nights of Goethe’s poetry as a rally. I am 5 years old, and all these years the image of a SAVAKA on television has been accompanied by stereotypes such as tie, liquor and cigarettes. Then when it comes to our series, they protest why you have shown Khmer drinking! Can I show the image of a Savaki prayer? We have another class in the series that both pray and broadcast their leaflet. The other floor was the same time as the cinema went, they listened to music, and ate drinking.
Pakravan emphasized: “We were traveling to Satra for this six months, how can we suddenly talk about confiscation?” Our story is also a love story, and we are only narrated in the context of a historical point. My question is, can it be so scary?
In explaining the story of Tasian, Pakravan reiterated the romantic narrative in the fifties: If I went to a stylish, money -making family who had lived a prosperous life in the same years and now a boy in love with this family, it means that it means that I want to be white? How to make such an understanding of the story? With all the recent serials that deal with embezzlement, corruption, theft and betrayal and even broadcast on television, are they representing an undesirable whole from the Islamic Republic!? Can this be a generalized look at the character and story of a series?
Referring to Satra’s strange behavior to monitor home network production, he added: “I don’t realize why we are required to be monitored where we are actually our competitors?” Why should the home theater network operate under the supervision of Satra? Mr. Asadzadeh and I have approved our plan for the past six months. Now why should this be reached to the seizure? Well Satra is a television subsidiary that wants to treat us according to television behaviors. Naturally, part of the home network production is also a competitor to TV, and Satra is reluctant to produce them. This process needs to be changed because the competitor is definitely not a good observation.
He added: “Why should the decision -makers be passive in the face of these attacks?” Why should they get into the game of people who are looking for files? Specifically, a group of influential people in the process of making these files are producing and can be pursued if we want to root. But the decision -making centers, instead of welcoming the injecting of love and hope in a romantic story in a series, are entering into the case of files and banning!
In response to criticism of female actors, she also emphasized: Can I say that all women had full hijab street five years ago and before the revolution? The result is the approach of television serials in which Ashraf Pahlavi has a full veil! Well the audience retracts this narrative.
Pakravan continued, referring to some criticism of the series: We have not been selling in the Tasian series, and today all the factors that have been trying to detail the series are saddened by these conditions. What is the criterion and according to what document can this series be distorted in history? I have narrated a romantic story that happened in a period of contemporary history, as well.
The director of Tasian also said about the pursuit of the problem of broadcasting: “In the talks with Satra, they gave us reforms every week, but suddenly they say, now we don’t know what to do!” What happened to you don’t know what to do? We do not do anything weird to be afraid of it.
Responding to what the judiciary explained the reason for preventing the series from broadcasting, Pakravan said: “The judiciary had no talk to us and I saw the news for the first time in the news agency.”
Recalling some of the past events on the Khatun series, he added: “When I was making” Khatun “series, the process of licensing the home products was still available to the Ministry of Guidance. In the first phase, the Ministry of Guidance announced that Khatun was not productive and did not issue a construction permit. I went in person and negotiated and the problem was resolved somewhat. We started producing the serial, and in this process of supervision of guidance, Satra was transferred to Satra. In respect of the law, we also sent a script to Satra. We were constantly going to meetings until the series was broadcast. They were constantly suspicious and worried about what I was doing! Many institutions and organizations thanked me after broadcasting that I had revived the national sweat for the audience. At the same time, there were people who said that this should not be broadcast, and today they had seized the “Tasian” today. To me. But people, family and land are important; Things that many have forgotten.
Source: Online News