“How to dress Dariush Mehrjui at the time of the murder of Darius, he says, he expects him to arrive for important guests or guests.
Report CinemaSpring Shabankanian wrote in Etemad newspaper: Last week, some news agencies quoted the lawyer of the murder of the famous Iranian cinema director; «Dariush Mehrjui and his wife; Wahideh Mohammadi Dafar wrote: “Court, Karim; Defended the first line for the crime of two counts of murder to twice the retribution; The defendant sentenced the second -tier to be m Also, Alexander, another defendant for injury, was sentenced to four years in prison, for theft, five years in prison, illegal entry into two years in prison and flogging, as well as David, another defendant on charges of murdering one year in prison, stealing a year of imprisonment, one year in prison, and one year in prison.
Meanwhile, Noban Fashidi, the lawyer of Wahid Mohammadiifar; Dariush Mehrjui’s wife tells Etemad: “Contrary to the material in some media, this vote is not definitive, and both the tail and the defendants can protest it. “The protest will be reviewed again in the Supreme Court.” The case of Mehrjui and his wife has faced conflicts and ambiguities from the very beginning, and so far, one year and five months have not been resolved even more ambiguities; Among these ambiguities were “many precious objects that existed in the Mehrjui house and are protected from the capture of the defendants; Like a golden necklace that was in Dariush Mehrjui and not stolen; The same motivation for the defendants to challenge the robbery, insufficient motivation for the defendants to do with this horrific crime, the intervention of third parties in the case, how to dress Darius Mehrjui at the time of the murder, which makes him expected to arrive for important guests or guests, and to the complete conflict of conflict and conflict. There is no late Mehrjui and his wife, lack of research tools such as access to crime evidence, electronic and telecommunication evidence, forensic laboratories and the like that are not available to their tail or lawyers, and the possibility of a knife or other sharp object that has been used in the murder. Now, “Trust” has been talking to Dariush Mehrjui’s wife, Wahid Mohammadifar’s wife, Wahid Mohammadifar’s wife, Wahid Mohammadifar’s mother.
At what stage is the case of the murder of Dariush Mehrjui and his wife, and what specific results have it reached? Last week, some media outlets announced that the Supreme Court had issued the defendants in the case, while the judiciary has not released news! You explain this.
Following the completion of the prosecution’s investigation, the first branch of the Alborz Province Criminal Court was investigated late last year on charges of the defendants and eventually sentenced one of them to commit two counts of deliberate murder, as well as condemning the rest of the defendants through other offenses, such as murder. The lawyers of the tail objected to the verdict and were sent to the Supreme Court for investigation. The Supreme Court has raised protests by complaints lawyers over the failure of the investigation and also failing to comply with some form and returning the case to Karaj for re -investigation. As a result of late summer this summer, several consecutive hearings were held in the same initial court (the Criminal Court of Alborz Province), followed by correspondence with the judicial authorities. Finally, a few days ago, on the 15th of March, the judges of the court issued a ruling on the case and, in spite of all the defense and evidence, confirmed the same decision and vote. It should be noted, however, that, contrary to the material in some media, this vote is not definitive, and both the tail and the defendants can protest again. The protest will be reviewed again in the Supreme Court.
Given that you said that the verdict is almost the same as the previous vote, would you as a lawyer in the vote? If you might say what matters of your objection will include?
My servant and colleague Mr. Reza Nemati, on behalf of Ms. Mohammadifar’s mother, will certainly protest this vote. The most important reason for this objection is that, according to the authorities, the process of investigating the investigation has not been fully and correct, and there are many unsolved ambiguities and points in the case, the most important of which relates to the motives of committing this catastrophic crime. The two main motivations for theft and revenge that have been the basis of the indictment and votes in our view, given the evidence and evidence in the case, are not sufficient and convincing. Neither the value of the property taken is such that it can justify the commitment of this terrible crime, nor were there any clear reasons for the hostility or serious hatred by the defendants of the late Mehrjui and his wife, which can be attributed to hatred. As a result, there should be different motivations such as threats or dedication, etc. to commit this crime by the defendants, which suggests the intervention of third parties and the existence of potential authorities or authorities.
Can you point out the most important things that you and the late Mehrjui tail are incomplete?
There are numerous detailed and detailed topics that require serious and detailed research. Including reviews of cameras on the route of the defendants, recovering information on the defendants and the victims (especially according to the police report of communication applications such as WhatsApp, Telegram, etc., some of the cell phones were not expected to have a murderer, or how to have a murderer. There has been a lot of price in the house from the capture of the criminals immune, such as the golden necklace that was Mr. Mehrjui and left untouched; The existence of these objects is also one of the things that challenges the acceptance of the robbery as the main motivation, and finally the completely contradictory statements of the defendants who have made one hundred percent differently at different stages of the prosecution and court each time.
You will explain more about the conflicts in the statements of the defendants.
The defendants’ statements about how to enter the crime site, sequence and arrange for criminal acts, murder instruments used, motivations and reasons for committing crime, as well as steadors and perpetrators of the murder, not only conflict with each other, but their statements at each stage of their previous statements. For example, in the same court this year, the defendants’ narratives of the incident were completely different from the narration that had been presented in last year’s court and the narratives that were previously presented during the preliminary investigation by the Intelligence Police and the Investigator. These conflicts remind us that in order to get a proper understanding and understanding of this criminal case, instead of relying on the mental arguments and conflicting statements of defendants who may lie with various motivations, we must consider scientific and objective evidence.
Given that the hypothesis of the existence of potential authorities or authorities has been repeatedly raised by their complaints and lawyers, have certain persons or persons been referred to court as a court?
The hypothesis of the intervention of the defendants and the defendants ‘hires was not solely raised by the lawyers’ lawyers, and perhaps the first assumption was raised about a week after the murder was raised by the intelligence agents and requested judicial investigations. It should be noted that premeditated murder is a general crime, and the investigation is an inherent task of the prosecutor or the prosecutor, but research instruments such as access to crime evidence, electronic and telecommunications evidence, legal medical laboratories, and the like are not available to their lawyers or lawyers. Therefore, until comprehensive and detailed investigations are conducted, the lawyers’ lawyers cannot answer this question. Unfortunately, the court and the other lawyer of the Mohammadi Family did not include the recent investigations and the contents of the electronic devices (in the same limited form of recovery) have not reached the vision of Wahid Mohammad Family’s lawyers despite my request.