cinema trust Abbas Abdi, a political activist, wrote on his personal channel: “Today, Thursday, newspapers were closed. I am writing here.” The most important duty of the government is to provide security, even more important than justice. Of course, pure injustice means complete insecurity, but in general, security comes first. Someone said that in an advanced country, he was taking a driving license test, he reached a crossroad and the light was green, he slowed down and crossed the crossroad. The examiner asked why did you slow down? He said that I was careful not to crash if a car came from the other side. He said that other cars don’t pass the red light and you don’t need to be careful. This means rule of law and security. Now let’s see what is going on here?
The Honorable Head of the Judiciary has warned many times about exit bans, including this year for the umpteenth time that: “If someone is banned from leaving, he should be notified, not that he finds out at the airport with his family.” Well, is this a request? Or a legal order?
Two days ago, Mrs. Maryam Moghadam, the cinema director, announced that her and her husband’s passports were seized again. The main problem is the following, which he says: “While I wanted to go and see my family in Sweden after a long time and maybe be able to attend the screening of our film, they confiscated my passport again at the airport and said that again I and Behtash (his wife) ) We have been banned from leaving. After getting the ticket and paying the exit and all other expenses. It was only a week since they returned our passports. I don’t understand why they returned the passports if they didn’t want to allow them to leave? to hurt our souls and harm us?”
Apart from the problem that happened to this lady and her husband, this process of announcing the exit ban while at the gate after the luggages have been delivered is an uncivil act against the dignity of citizenship and even common sense. Why don’t you announce the curfew in Sana system? Where did this harassment come from? The plane ticket will be lost and the money cannot be returned because it is not possible to cancel. Who will bear the cost of the output that was taken and return it? When output is not done. It is not believed that the delay of the flight of the foreign plane due to the removal of the luggage will not be compensated for by the airport.
In addition, where does all the time of the passengers who are waiting for the departure of the luggage go? All these big material effects are nothing compared to the psychological and political consequences of this behavior? What does it mean that after a year of being banned from leaving the passport office, they call you, come and get your passport, and then they are banned again at the airport for three days?
The problem is that Mr. Ajei is different from the previous heads of the department in two important ways. They are familiar with the intricacies of this power and the rights of the people and the interference of the officers, and they have the will to correct this situation. If there was no will, he would never have spoken about this repeatedly, just as the previous ones did not say anything. So, if this will is to be realized, they should issue an order to investigate this matter. If it is legal, they should announce it clearly so that everyone knows what laws we have, and if it is not legal, the culprits should be dealt with and material and psychological damages should also be paid from them.
According to the Qur’an, if one person is killed without a right, it is as if they have killed everyone, so violating the rights of each person also means violating the rights of the general public. I hope that this case will be addressed and the damage will be compensated and become a basis for future behavior.