Cinema Asked Professor Mahmoud Dolatabadi; cinema or literature; They replied that he had no good relationship with cinema, and when the reporter sought the reason, he said he was lying in the cinema, but not in literature.
According to Gimfa, cinema causes this because of the need for technology. In essence, technology causes some to lie in some places. But on the other hand, because of the sophistication of the cinema, the filmmaker goes to the fast filmmaker. If he has a false and false claim, with a wrong camera, a poor man and a misrepresentation of the filmmaker; Lu is going to be the filmmaker, and there is no honesty in his art. The End movie is exactly such a movie. The claim of philosophy is intellectual and allegory of the Platonic cave, but in the eyes of an expert, there is nothing but an absurd claim. The respected filmmaker has the penis and tries to make a postmodern work. Of course, I have no doubt that the filmmaker does not know what postmodern art and philosophy is!
The End is a post -Akharalzani musical drama directed by Joshua Openimer, which tells the story of a wealthy family living in a luxury refuge in a salt mine after a global environmental catastrophe. The tragedy has made the surface of the earth uninhabited and a family consisting of Mother (Tilda Swindon), father (Michael Shenon), their 5 -year -old son (George Macay), a maid and several others, has been isolated in the shelter for two decades. The boy, who has never seen the outside world, thinks that the earth is completely destroyed. Their daily lives go through repetitive routines, limited conversations, and some kind of appearance, but the psychological and emotional tensions of isolation lies under this peace.
The story is changed to the entrance of the shelter with the arrival of a stranger, a young girl (Mosque Ingram). This girl, who brought stories and secrets from the outside world, gradually disrupts the fragile balance of the family. His presence causes family members to face fears, repressed past and their inner struggles. Mother and father, each with personal problems, respond differently to this stranger; Mother with doubt and fear, and the father with curiosity. The young boy, who has not had any experience in the outside world, is attracted to this girl, and this relationship challenges her to question her beliefs about the world and her family. So what is this summary of the story of the film? Does the summary of the story give the allegory of the Plato Cave? Where idealism is born and human beings doubt about their knowledge? You might think with yourself that you are with a philosophical film; Well, let me also clarify my view of this. Classroom cinema is not anyone.
The philosophy of medium is a separate, and for better understanding and explanation, one must refer to the same medium. But if the artist really has philosophical concerns, this form is from the path of art and entertainment that emerges in the film or novel. The best example is Dostoevsky’s crime and retribution. Rasklnikov and his philosophical world are more of a story. A story with medium and artistic elements that has not tried to get out of it. If it is a philosophical word, it is said through art and in the language of art, nothing else. This line of art and philosophy is not known as the filmmaker. His work is not artistic at all. It has no entertainment and does not succeed in attracting the audience. It is really impossible to tolerate this film. Slogan moments, pre -dialogues, and a story that does not fascinate the audience. On the other hand, it may be imagined that the filmmaker has sacrificed all of this to reach philosophy, but not for us philosophers of this film has not even a line of philosophy, and the filmmaker is very small to say such topics. Their lack of knowing is also the film in the moment. Master of Dolatabadi said well that the cinema could lie, but our filmmaker does not know lying.
These days, Ms. Tilda Swinten in every film represents the works that fall into the trap of philosophical slogans. It is as if he has a particular interest in choosing such screenplays. Although he is also suitable for this role because of his physical physics, and in his actions he knows the acting well, the text has made his play nothing but ordinary moments. His attempt to create a complex mental position is not made at all, and every activity is weak and absurd. As I wrote in the summary of the story, he plays the role of the mother. The character who makes great claims from his language, the filmmaker. The painting of Lady’s masterpiece with a sunny umbrella describes the work of Claude Monet Great and claims that it is a masterpiece! That is, the filmmaker intends to say that today’s audience does not know the difference between good and bad art and simply gives a masterpiece because of the media atmosphere? I also love the criticism, but can such a person who made such a bad movie has that claim? However, this absurd claim to be very irrelevant music and makes the film worse and worse. These great -backed claims, relevant musicals, and stereotypical dialogues make the work so vulgar that the ordinary audience is unlikely to endure it for half an hour.
Beyond the formics issues, The End did not perform well in the technique discussion. Consider the film’s atmosphere, for example. The bourgeoisie’s semi -leaf, where a wealthy class is trapped, like the works of Lewis Bonuel, in the midst of this prison paradise, the absurdity of the bourgeoisie’s life becomes more apparent than ever before. To make this the right thing, the end of the world and the destruction of the outside world had to be well constructed. The audience must believe in the destruction of the outside world, and on the other hand, the audience must admit that these people have not seen the Plato cave for twenty years. We also have characters that we don’t know at all. Who are these people? What are the identities and what is chemistry between them? What about the curious boy? Her character is made? Want to see and touch the real world? His beliefs are challenged and he does not know if he is in love! In my view that is not made. The audience does not like the work so much that it does not pay attention to the details at all. To buy the audience’s attention, you must work in a strong story. We have to engage in his emotions moment by moment and make him part of our story world. The End does not do any of these. It has a very basic and superficial script that does not engage the audience. The acting team, despite the good acts, is not visible, and everything remains in the same type. Father Type, Mother Brigade, World End Team, Criticism of Human Recognition of Truth, Underground Brigade, and so on. Everything is in The End Type.
In the end, it can be said that the movie is bad. Neither can it be explained better nor need to explain further. Nearly half -hour work that has nothing to do with the intellectual. Of course, we have faced many similar works over the past few years. Movies like Triangle of Sadness, The Menu and Platform, which have strange and superficial claims, are all bad and vulgar. In my opinion, the end cannot be tolerated. I am unlikely to know that dear audiences who love cinema, will be able to watch and endure even half an hour of this movie.
Author’s Score to Movie: 1 out of 1